Wednesday, February 3, 2010

GUEST POST: Living With Your Home Office by Jennifer Paulish

Living with your Home Office
by Jennifer A. Paulish

Jennifer A. Paulish is an Independent Interior Designer/Project Manager with a passion of creating functional and inspiring Interiors in the Corporate, Retail, and Healthcare Industry. On Linked-In http://www.linkedin.com/pub/jennifer-paulish/17/838/a05

I have always been keenly aware of how the physical environment can psychologically affect a person. So really it was no surprise that my chosen career path was Interior Design. Specializing in Corporate Design, I have spent much of my time educating companies and individuals on the importance of bringing an Interior Designer onboard in the beginning stages of the design process. This affords an opportunity for the designer’s ideas to be incorporated into a comprehensive business plan that is synchronized with the company’s brand and image. The result is a more productive workplace, distinguished by open communication, corporate loyalty and job satisfaction.
In today’s rapidly changing market, many companies find themselves in survival mode. Therefore, we are finding a rise in small businesses, telecommuters and contract employees working from home. There is a great deal of discipline in order to draw the line between home and work and while you may no longer be physically going to a corporate office, there are important issues to consider so your home office will work for you. This being said, I have a few suggestions to make your home office both functional and inspiring.

1. Designate Space- It is important to designate space for your home office. If you are fortunate enough to have a basement, lofted area, or extra room perfect! If not do not despair; you do not need a large footprint all it takes is a little rearranging in order to create a nook that is specifically for your work. Think outside the box with this; can a closet become your home office?

2. Keep it Professional-Remember this is your place of work. Stay organized; keep it clean/ clutter free, and comfortable. Take pride in this space.


3. Ergonomics- More often than not ergonomics come into play only when there is a problem (back/carpal tunnel syndrome). Think of ergonomics as preventative medicine. So here are a few things to keep in mind when creating your space.

• Your desk or work surface should be deep enough to place your monitor approximately 20”away from your eyes (30” deep will accommodate this)
• Desk height should be elbow height when seated (29” above finished floor is typical)
• Keyboard and mouse at elbow height
• Top of screen should be at or just below eye level
• Chair should be easily adjustable, provide support, front edge of seat pan should be rounded in waterfall fashion, forward and backward tilt, and adjustable/removable arms. Think of your chair as an investment and purchase the best quality product you can afford. Call a furniture dealer and you can often find refurbished chairs (and desks) at some decent prices and there is always craigslist.

4. Have some fun- Aesthetically your space should be inspiring and energizing and do not be afraid to add some personal touches in order to achieve this. This can be achieved in many different ways; choose a paint color that you are drawn to, inspiration/pin-up board, artwork, mix up finishes, etc.
Remember you are your own brand- What is it you want to say?

(Photo courtesy Apartment Therapy)

Tuesday, February 2, 2010

Who Has Edge In Economic Recovery?

A slew of economic data indicate a recovery is looming, as consumer spending and manufacturing output and compensation increase. Major companies have announced hiring plans, including 12,000 from Starwood Hotels, 1,200 from Ford Motor Company and 600 from CarMax. However, with hundreds of thousands of workers in competition for jobs, job seekers will need every advantage to impress potential employers.

Hiring managers receive thousands of resumes for open positions. With the talent pool so large, employers use any method possible to weed out potential candidates. These range from credit checks to drug and health screenings. Some use these as character references; other methods indicate whether the candidate will be a potential liability.

It may seem controversial, as one’s credit score and health generally have little to do with most job functions. However, with the sheer number of job seekers applying, employers can afford to be picky.

According to a 2006 Society for Human Resource Management poll, 43 percent of employers conducted credit checks on potential employees, up from 25 percent in 1998. While employers may legally conduct credit checks on potential hires, under the Fair Credit Reporting Act, companies must secure the candidates consent to do so. Further, if an employer decides not to hire an applicant because of information gleaned from the report, that employer must divulge this to the candidate.

Job seekers certainly do not need to discuss their credit during the interview process; however, they should take care to know everything listed on these reports. If the decision comes down to two equally qualified candidates, the employer may take the person with the better credit. Knowing where you stand will help you combat that decision, whether through logical explanations or examples of how you are the better choice despite what the credit check says.

In addition to credit checks, due to proposed health care legislation and rising costs to employers, some organizations are immediately eliminating candidates with unhealthy habits. Memorial Hospital in Chattanooga, TN will no longer hire new employees who use any kind of tobacco products, on or off duty. In addition to their usual drug screenings, hires will also be tested for nicotine. The company cited employee well-being and the health of patients as the primary reason.

This practice is nothing new. Medical benefits administration company Weyco and Scotts Miracle Grow companies stopped hiring smokers in 2006. Weyco fired four workers who opted out of their mandatory nicotine screening. In 2005, Wal-Mart’s executive vice president of benefits distributed an internal memo discussing ways to hire and retain healthier workers, according to the New York Times. Through education benefits, the company hoped to draw younger, presumably healthier employees.

There has been a trend for years to cultivate a healthier workforce. Only recently does candidate health seem to be a consideration in hiring practices.

Colleen Madden
Research Associate

Monday, February 1, 2010

2009 Relocation Report

Job Seekers Relocated Less in Second Half of 2009

2009 RELOCATION UP FROM 2008, BUT STILL NEAR HISTORIC LOWS

After rising to the highest level since 2006, relocation among job seekers slowed in the second half of 2009, with only 7.3 percent of fourth-quarter job seekers taking positions in new towns. That is the lowest relocation rate on record, according to a report released Monday by global outplacement consultancy, Challenger, Gray & Christmas, Inc.

Relocation by job seekers peaked in the second quarter of the year, when 18.2 percent moved for new positions. That was the highest relocation rate since the second quarter of 2006, when an identical 18.2 percent of those finding positions relocated.

The new findings come from the latest Challenger Job Market Index, a quarterly survey of approximately 3,000 job seekers from a variety of industries nationwide.

According to the Index, the percentage of relocating job seekers dropped to 13.4 percent in the third quarter and dropped further to the record low to end the year. An average relocation rate of 10.4 percent in the last half of 2009 was down from 16.3 percent from the first six months of the year.

Despite the second-half slowdown, relocation for the year increased to an annual average of 13.3 percent, up from 11.6 percent in 2008, when the housing market collapse was at its worst. The 2008 average was the lowest annual figure since the Challenger Index began in 1986. The 2009 annual average is the second lowest.

“Relocation is still a last resort for the overwhelming majority of job seekers. We did see a surge in the second quarter of the year, amid early signs of an economic recovery. Perhaps, when it became obvious that the job market was recovering more slowly than the general economy, relocation dipped again. When job seekers perceive their chances of finding work are poor regardless of the geographic area in which they look, they are likely to stay where they have an established support network,” said John A. Challenger, chief executive officer of Challenger, Gray & Christmas.

Indeed, the job market has shown few signs of improvement over the last six months. While job losses slowed significantly in the second half of the year, there is no indication that employers are ready to increase hiring. As a result, the national unemployment rate remains stubbornly high, at 10 percent, and the number of people experiencing long-term joblessness lasting 27 weeks or more is at record highs.

“There are pockets of low unemployment, but according the latest data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, only 12 metropolitan areas were still enjoying unemployment rates lower than five percent in November. In May, when the relocation rate was at its highest level of the year, there were still about 20 cities with unemployment under five percent,” Challenger noted.

“This is not to say that job seekers would not benefit from expanding their searches to different geographic areas. Any time job seekers expand their job search parameters in any way – whether it is looking in different cities, looking in different industries or looking in different occupations related to their fundamental skill set – they will greatly increase their chances of success,” said Challenger.

In 2009, job seekers were far more likely to change industries than relocate. Over the year, an average of 36 percent of those finding new positions switched industries. That was down slightly from a 2008 annual average of 39 percent.

“Relocation is much more difficult to achieve. Moving is consistently ranked as one of the most stressful events one can endure. It often ranks right behind job loss. So, when you throw these two situations at an individual, it is easy to see why very few people are willing to consider it, even if it does improve the chances of job-search success,” said Challenger.

“In addition to stress, those who find themselves out of work are certainly concerned with the considerable expense of relocation. For homeowners, finding a new home is often dependent on selling the old one, which is a much more difficult prospect in this market. While job opportunities may exist across the country, unless the monetary compensation makes up for moving expenses or the company offers some sort of relocation package, a job seeker is likely to stay put.”

Relocation rates tracked by Challenger have fallen steadily since the survey began in 1986. In 1986, for example, the quarterly relocation rate averaged 42 percent. In 1993, relocation averaged 35 percent over the year, but reached a record high of 49.2 percent in the second quarter. After 1993, however, job seekers appear to be more averse to relocation, with the quarterly average sinking to 22 percent from 1994 through 2000.

“Around 2001, the annual average for relocation fell below 20 percent for the first time, and has not returned above that rate since. What made the decline in relocation even more surprising is that it came at a time when the Internet made it easier than ever to search for out-of-town jobs,” said Challenger.

“However, the same Internet technology that makes out-of-town job seeking so easy also makes it easier for people to work from anywhere. Faster and cheaper Internet connections, coupled with relatively low air-travels costs, made it possible for job seekers to gain out-of-town employment without actually moving out of town,” he added.

According to Challenger, relocation rates are likely to increase as the job market improves over the next year or two, but they almost certainly will not return to the levels reached in the late 80s and early 90s.

“In the 1980s and early 1990s, the workplace was dominated by the baby boomers, who seemed more open to changing their zip codes to find positions and move up the corporate ladder. Now, this population appears to have hit an age where they are settled in and less likely to move. The younger generations coming up behind the boomers seem less willing to pull up their roots for a job. They are more likely to relocate based on lifestyle choices versus occupational choices,” said Challenger.

“This could present some challenges for recruiters as the economy improves. Companies will have to depend more on their local talent pool. In order to attract highly-coveted candidates from out of town, they will have to offer something beyond a good salary and benefits package. The companies that will have the most success at long-distance recruiting are likely to provide desirable relocation packages.

“Additionally, those based in regions that offer shorter commuting times, plenty of recreational activities, a good culture and arts scene will attract quality candidates. More importantly, the successful recruiters will be those with companies that actually give employees the time and balance to enjoy these regional benefits,” Challenger concluded.

Percentage of Job Seekers Relocating

1986 – 2009

Q1

Q2

Q3

Q4

ANN AVG

1986

45.0%

43.0%

40.0%

39.0%

41.8%

1987

37.0%

32.0%

34.0%

35.0%

34.5%

1998

37.0%

36.0%

34.0%

36.0%

35.8%

1989

35.0%

36.0%

31.0%

32.0%

33.5%

1990

30.0%

34.0%

31.0%

27.0%

30.5%

1991

30.0%

28.0%

26.3%

21.0%

26.3%

1992

30.2%

28.3%

28.2%

20.5%

26.8%

1993

36.4%

49.2%

30.5%

25.0%

35.3%

1994

20.5%

21.3%

15.5%

24.7%

20.5%

1995

17.1%

17.2%

20.4%

24.1%

19.7%

1996

19.4%

20.5%

29.1%

24.1%

23.3%

1997

19.8%

21.5%

18.7%

20.1%

20.0%

1998

18.3%

27.1%

23.3%

23.7%

23.1%

1999

25.5%

25.3%

22.4%

25.9%

24.8%

2000

20.4%

21.6%

23.5%

26.2%

22.9%

2001

17.1%

16.6%

17.3%

17.0%

17.0%

2002

14.0%

12.1%

15.8%

15.2%

14.3%

2003

15.1%

14.9%

12.9%

12.7%

13.9%

2004

13.2%

16.5%

14.9%

14.2%

14.7%

2005

16.0%

16.4%

16.2%

15.2%

16.0%

2006

16.4%

18.2%

16.1%

15.4%

16.5%

2007

16.6%

15.4%

15.6%

11.0%

14.7%

2008

8.9%

11.4%

13.4%

12.6%

11.6%

2009

14.4%

18.2%

13.4%

7.3%

13.3%

QTR AVG

23.0%

24.2%

22.6%

21.9%

Source: Challenger, Gray & Christmas, Inc.

CHALLENGER JOB MARKET INDEX

2008 Q1

Q2

Q3

Q4

2009 Q1

Q2

Q3

Q4

Percentage Relocating

8.9%

11.4%

13.4%

12.6%

14.4%

18.2%

13.4%

7.3%

Percentage Relocating with Employed Spouse

29.0%

20.0%

22.6%

21.7%

31.0%

14.7%

22.0%

28.6%

Percentage Changing Industries in New Job

42.1%

37.3%

35.9%

42.1%

41.8%

36.6%

41.8%

22.3%

Source: Challenger, Gray & Christmas, Inc.

Thursday, January 28, 2010

Bulletin: SOTU, Jobs Data

President Turns Focus Toward Jobs

The economy and job creation was a central theme in Wednesday night’s State of the Union address. While early actions by this administration, including bank and automotive bailouts and stimulus measures, helped to dramatically stem the tide of job losses, President Obama acknowledged that more must be done to ignite job creation. Unfortunately, there is no magic bullet that will quickly lower the nation’s unemployment rate from 10 percent. The job market will definitely be helped by Obama’s proposed tax cuts for business, additional money for small-business loans and infrastructure projects. The question is will Congress step up and get these initiatives passed. Even if they do, increased job creation still comes down to whether employers feel confident enough to begin hiring anew. Did President Obama effectively address Americans’ concerns about the job market? What other steps could the White House and/or Congress take to spur job growth? In which industries are early job gains likely to occur?

More Positive Economic News

Two reports out today could signal further strengthening of the economy. The Commerce Department reported this morning that orders for durable goods were up nearly 1% in December, as companies restocked inventories and demand for equipment continues to grow overseas. Meanwhile, the Labor Department reported that weekly claims for unemployment benefits fell to 470,000 from 478,000 the prior week. The decline was not as big as expected, however, which some see as a sign that improvements in the job market may be slowing. There have also been some large job-cut announcements in recent days, but John Challenger says that the recent activity may be seasonal in nature. It is not unusual to see a surge in job cuts and jobless claims increase in the beginning of the year, even in the best economy. Many retailers and other employers are letting go of their seasonal workers and others companies are making adjustments to their payrolls to reflect budgetary objectives. Is it too soon to worry about a possible slowdown or reversal in this recovery? When might job creation become more steady and sustainable?

Tuesday, January 26, 2010

Start-Up Activity Jumps to Four-Year High in 2009


EARLY RECOVERY SIGNS PUSH SUMMER START-UP RATE TO 11.8%



Start-up activity among jobless managers and executives reached a four-year high in 2009, as early signs of a recovery in the second quarter led to a summer surge in entrepreneurship. The hope is that the momentum established in the second half of 2009 will carry into 2010, since new business development is considered critical to a sustainable recovery.


The percentage of unemployed workers starting their own business rose to an average of 8.6 percent in 2009, according to the latest Challenger Job Market Index released Monday by global outplacement consultancy Challenger, Gray & Christmas, Inc. The 2009 average is up 69 percent from 2008, when the start-up rate was just 5.1 percent, the lowest annual average in the history of the Index.


The biggest surge in entrepreneurial activity occurred in the third quarter, when 11.8 percent of job seekers started their own firms. That was the highest quarterly figure since the second quarter of 2005, according to the Challenger Index, which is based on a quarterly survey of approximately 3,000 job seekers in a variety of industries nationwide.


The start-up rate fell to 7.3 percent in the final quarter of the year, but this is not unusual. In fact, from 1999 through 2009, the percentage of job seekers starting businesses in the fourth quarter averaged 6.4 percent, nearly two percentage points lower than the 8.3 percent averaged in the first three quarters during the same time period.


“Most signs indicate that the recession ended as the summer got underway. However, the recovery has yet to reach the job market, where unemployment remains near 10 percent and the number of Americans experiencing long-term joblessness lasting six months or longer is at a record high. The combination of the improving economy and stagnant job market may have contributed to the surge in start-up activity among job seekers over the summer,” said John A. Challenger, chief executive officer of Challenger, Gray & Christmas.


“Rather than endure several more months of unemployment, as employers slowly move toward renewed hiring, many job seekers are opting to exit the labor pool and start their own firms. The start-up rate might have been even higher if banks had loosened their lending standards. Even today, as the economy continues to improve and banks record healthy profits, loans are still difficult to obtain,” he noted.


The percentage of small and independent business owners who reported difficulties in arranging credit in December was at its highest level since 1983, according to the latest monthly survey by the National Federation of Independent Business (NFIB). Despite the continued difficulty in obtaining loans, confidence among these business owners increased in the second half of the year. The NFIB Optimism Index averaged 88.2 (on a scale of 100) over the last six months of 2009, up from a monthly average of 85.2 in the first half of the year.


The difficulty in obtaining credit was not a deterrent for many of those who wanted to be their own boss. In addition to Challenger data, government data also showed an increase in self employment. The number of self-employed Americans rose to 8.9 million in December, up from 8.7 million a year earlier.


The biggest gains in self-employment occurred among those 55 and older. The ranks of self employed among those 55- to 64-years-old and those 65 and older grew by 93,000 and 213,000 respectively. In contrast, the number of self-employed 35- to 44-year-olds shrank by 70,000. Meanwhile, the population of 45- to 54-year-old entrepreneurs fell by 60,000 in 2009.


SELF-EMPLOYMENT BY AGE


Dec-08

Dec-09

Change

%Change

16+

8,701,000

8,915,000

214,000

2.5%

16-19

49,000

30,000

-19,000

-38.8%

20-24

256,000

298,000

42,000

16.4%

25-34

1,337,000

1,351,000

14,000

1.0%

35-44

2,027,000

1,957,000

-70,000

-3.5%

45-54

2,420,000

2,360,000

-60,000

-2.5%

55-64

1,888,000

1,981,000

93,000

4.9%

65+

726,000

939,000

213,000

29.3%

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics


In the Challenger survey, the portion of job seekers starting a business who were over 40 averaged 88 percent over the last two quarters. That was up significantly from the first half of the year, when the percentage of entrepreneurs over 40 averaged 72 percent.


“Entrepreneurship used to be thought of as a young person’s endeavor, as it requires a significant amount of energy and drive. The myth that older entrepreneurs lack these qualities has long been shattered. In fact, seasoned professionals have a decided advantage over their younger counterparts. They not only have the energy required for entrepreneurship, they have the experience, communication and technology skills and a strong network of business connections,” said Challenger.


“Some of these older entrepreneurs serve as independent consultants and contractors, and often end up working on projects for their former employers. This arrangement is ideal for companies in this fragile economy. They are not quite ready to increase hiring, but they need people who know what they are doing to make sure projects are completed on time and at a high quality. Experienced consultants do not need to be brought up to speed. They can come in and begin contributing immediately. Employers end up saving money by paying a project fee, as opposed to salary and benefits. It’s a win-win for everyone,” Challenger said.


PERCENTAGE OF JOB SEEKERS STARTING

THEIR OWN BUSINESS, 1999 - 2009


Q1

Q2

Q3

Q4

Annual Average

1999

8.7%

6.2%

6.0%

8.0%

7.2%

2000

9.3%

7.8%

7.7%

3.5%

7.1%

2001

7.8%

8.0%

6.5%

9.0%

7.8%

2002

11.5%

11.2%

10.6%

5.2%

9.6%

2003

5.7%

7.1%

7.8%

6.7%

6.8%

2004

10.1%

9.9%

9.8%

6.5%

9.1%

2005

9.2%

13.1%

7.9%

6.6%

9.2%

2006

8.2%

6.2%

7.0%

9.2%

7.7%

2007

10.6%

6.0%

10.1%

5.7%

8.1%

2008

7.2%

4.3%

6.1%

2.7%

5.1%

2009

6.5%

8.7%

11.8%

7.3%

8.6%

AVG.

8.6%

8.0%

8.3%

6.4%


PERCENTAGE OF JOB SEEKERS WHO STARTED

BUSINESSES OLDER THAN 40, 1999 - 2009


Q1

Q2

Q3

Q4

Annual Average

1999

92.9%

91.7%

91.7%

92.9%

92.3%

2000

76.2%

56.3%

78.6%

80.0%

72.8%

2001

75.0%

82.6%

93.8%

75.0%

81.6%

2002

64.3%

61.0%

78.6%

73.3%

69.3%

2003

73.7%

78.1%

88.5%

73.7%

78.5%

2004

87.9%

78.1%

77.8%

81.3%

81.3%

2005

87.0%

86.7%

88.9%

84.6%

86.8%

2006

81.8%

90.0%

70.6%

77.8%

80.0%

2007

88.0%

83.3%

94.4%

61.5%

81.8%

2008

54.9%

52.9%

57.6%

52.2%

54.4%

2009

69.2%

75.0%

90.4%

85.7%

80.1%

AVG.

77.3%

76.0%

82.8%

76.2%


Source: Challenger, Gray & Christmas, Inc.

Wednesday, January 20, 2010

2009 Technology Cuts Breakdown

2009 TECHNOLOGY JOB CUTS

Telecom

Computer

Electronics

QRTLY TOTAL

Quarter 1

18,972

31,580

33,665

84,217

Quarter 2

1,876

19,881

12,134

33,891

Quarter 3

18,967

2,253

3,588

24,808

Quarter 4

4,253

11,547

15,913

31,713

TOTAL

44,068

65,261

65,300

174,629

Total represents 13.6% of 2009 job cuts (1,288,030)

2008 TECHNOLOGY JOB CUTS

Telecom

Computer

Electronics

QRTLY TOTAL

Quarter 1

6,577

4,840

5,928

17,345

Quarter 2

19,142

10,429

4,073

33,644

Quarter 3

2,652

28,733

6,884

38,269

Quarter 4

20,277

20,858

25,177

66,312

TOTAL

48,648

64,860

42,062

155,570

Total represents 12.7% of 2008 job cuts (1,223,993)

ANNUAL TECH-SECTOR JOB CUTS

2001 - 2009

Q1

Q2

Q3

Q4

Total

2001

161,520

151,869

213,420

168,772

695,581

2002

110,247

132,953

91,450

133,511

468,161

2003

61,032

36,967

47,998

82,328

228,325

2004

29,513

34,213

54,701

57,686

176,113

2005

59,537

39,720

41,439

34,048

174,744

2006

39,379

29,226

50,957

11,619

131,181

2007

32,021

32,314

26,242

16,718

107,295

2008

17,345

33,644

38,269

66,312

155,570

2009

84,217

33,891

24,808

31,713

174,629

ANNOUNCED TECH CUTS BY STATE/INDUSTRY

2009

STATE

COMPUTER

ELECTRONICS

TELECOM

TOTAL

CA

32,064

27,608

3,974

63,646

NY

13,172

167

16,037

29,376

MA

2,722

8,736

311

11,769

TX

1,361

9,267

425

11,053

KS

10,670

10,670

WA

6,334

582

393

7,309

IL

988

1,666

4,531

7,185

FL

769

5,357

25

6,151

PA

1,300

3,055

253

4,608

AZ

106

3,878

3,984

NC

1,465

1,700

223

3,388

OH

2,240

226

450

2,916

VA

1,554

587

2,141

ID

2,000

2,000

CO

825

622

1,447

MN

320

415

400

1,135

AR

1,000

1,000

SD

15

575

590

MO

564

564

IN

160

365

525

KY

400

81

481

MD

124

241

365

WI

300

25

325

NH

260

260

MI

250

250

GA

141

95

236

OR

209

209

NV

200

200

UT

180

180

NM

178

178

TN

169

169

SC

90

90

IA

57

30

87

LA

56

56

OK

50

50

NJ

25

25

MT

11

11

TOTALS

65,261

65,300

44,068

174,629

Source: Challenger, Gray & Christmas, Inc. ©


GUEST POST: Our Friend "Telecommuting," By Jan Marino



Bold

Telecommuting Trail Tips



Here are the new workplace realities I see everyday as a personal branding expert: Less Job Security - More Freelancing - Delayed Retirement - Generational Diversity - Increased Telecommuting.
Of these realities, increased telecommunting gets very little attention because it's been around since the late 80's and 90's. We assume that workers know the "ins and outs" of the work-from home option. Telecommuting can be our best friend or our worst enemy....so here are practical trail tips I learned as a telecommuter for six years:
1. Secure a designated space in your home for an office....the kitchen table isn't the best place camp out. Choose a space that is your place and customize it for you and your needs i.e. shelves, printer and laptop space, dedicated phone line, unless you're like me and have gone strickly cell, good lighting, window if possible, sunbox if not, ergonomic chair, whiteboard and above all a "keep out" sign (unless you're in a Les Nesman situation like me-then take over the basement).
2. Get organized and keep a schedule and become very disciplined. Depending on your job, expect to spend a lot of time of conference calls....endless conference calls....boring, droning on-&-on conference calls where they completely forget you're on the line....so learn to multitask.
3. Make it a habit to stay in touch with your organization on a regular basis. "Out of sight, out of mind" is very true when it comes to telecommuting....lots of "things" go on in the corporate office...like project assignments,etc...remind your colleagues you're still on the team. Calls or emails, LinkedIn whatever works.
4. Get dressed every day - business casual is good....ratty workout clothes aren't not. Wearing ratting clothes all day made you feel grungy and crabby....crabby telecommuter's aren't good.
5. Try to keep regular hours....you can work all the time and not realize that you haven't left the house in days - honestly. Take regular breaks.
6. Fight the isolation by moving the office to Panera's one day a week.
7. Remember that you'll be having very interesting conversations with your dog or cat and they always have the best answers!

http://highgainco.blogspot.com

Follow @Work